What is violence?
Each override issued by Human Rights on the right of so-called violent. Robbery and murder and prevent others from freedom, property, and contempt forms of violence, and they jumped on the victim's what it feels it is her right. And is divided into physical violence and another Okhlavi and moral. Offset tolerance of violence. Is it any justice interview violence with violence? Or to be tolerant with those who practice violence?
Reciprocity or retribution: The interview violence with violence has been known since ancient; both in the heavenly or celestial position, different goals and objectives. But philosophers have taken the issue of violence in terms of the exercise is to be prevented and destroying them. And that reciprocity continuing to engage in violence and is not a cure him logically. Violence is not eliminated violence. And the human tendency to fight the use of force, violence and other forms of LED reactions have practiced them from such violence.
What are the reasons to think and act, even though they differ from our thoughts and our beliefs and Slokatena process. So it is this ability vary depending on the circumstances and acceptance of people. Vlltsameh limits and if the amount of their overriding reaction of others has become an opportunity for the manifestation of evil and injustice. Why this restriction, which opens the door to the survival of the violence?
From where he is a human phenomenon, Vtaatgm in violence several reasons and factors. So I took him as their theme several science Kalpjuloggio through Neurology and Genetics, and sociology and psychology. Criminology and is an effort to identify the causes of violence at this level.
alospab Social and economic.
alospab Political and cultural.
Psychological causes:
Explanations: that violence is not seen except Menhsmon and vulnerable, and the victors do not see any violence in their actions. See "Heraclitus" that violence origin of life. The "Nietzsche", opines that mount on human violence. However, expressed differs among the strong and the weak. And that on the basis of this violence is determined by the nature of individuals and nations and the status and role in the construction of rings of human civilization. And that violence in the case of authentic presence and it does not taste of life that are free of violence. Taste of life, freedom and enjoyment of the right of concern loss. The power Algillah is paid to innovation, so is entitled to the strongest what is not entitled to weak. The existentialists argue that the violence resulting from the nature of the relationship between humans and the multiplicity of Alonawat tendency with each other to possess and intent to Chieih is that breeds violence and makes a man at the mercy of insanity. The "Anqlz" sees the origin of the building. Contradiction between reality as an area for the entry into force of the law and rights, human feel Bbgenh and generates a violent force him to overcome, and the execution of the present and eliminate it, and the embodiment of aspirations violently prohibited by law. So be worthy to distinguish between two types of violence. Destructive violence that is practiced at the expense of human rights, and violence construction. In other words, man is forced to take violent means when they are threatened by virtue g ...
How can access to meet evil with good?
Through the perception of violence and cons void:
Violence begets violence.
Violence is not normal and it shows when they are life-threatening.
Violence can be treated by standing on its causes.
Meet violence with violence as a pretext criminals and losers in addressing violence treatment worthy of the human being as an object Mtkhalq. Through nonviolence pros:
Nonviolence recipe worthy of human beings. Ennobled him about the animal.
Nonviolence fights evil and fueled. And is strategically wise men in excellence for the people of violence in terms of the nobility and the means of His Highness purposes.
Non-violence should not be approached with cheese and negative, and it is a struggle to tame and spacing on the same evil.
If tolerance is the accepted methods of others
At that Virtue building does not last unless founded on what ensures survival, so do not be a virtue of what can be produced chaos or evil. And has passed us that freedom and democracy (rights) limits and controls should not be bypassed or infringed upon. And therefore not be reasonable tolerance of not forgiving.
If tolerance heading towards the sources of violence where they are intended, and dealing with the opposite of tolerance threatens tolerance, as well as lax begets violence and the persistent abandonment of violence and force. It is not reasonable tolerance toward those who threaten tolerance. Such as respect for democracy by the enemies of democracy.
It is also all of the "Makiavill" and "Spaansr" and "Nietzsche" tolerance best way to ensure the success of any project, especially in the field of politics.
And has been associated with tolerance in Islamic history and Christian ... and a tendency to fight hatred and contempt of atonement between the people of boredom and bees and religions. And emerged from among the Muslim people of moderation and moderation and fight fanaticism and extremism, and met with West European approval of religious freedom in a way out of religious violence.
The relative moral values make the limits of tolerance varies by cultures.
And not tolerance but acceptance of both parties waive all forms of coercion and arrogance and hatred and bullying.
And the view of many philosophers to deal with others should not be paid to the abandonment of communities and non-possession of the means of deterrence, as it should ignore the culture and cultural values of the other.
So not only tolerance consciously tolerant to the field of his powers and limits. Are these conditions ensure tolerance check, or cause the failure?
The tackler in any condition to achieve tolerance. And that tolerance should not be subject to any condition.
The wisdom of tolerance, not to restrict any precondition ..
In terms of the form:
Because each prerequisite is placed against the tolerance, under any consideration, such as relative values, is the refusal of the other, and make tolerance blown passions and self-assessments. And thus eliminate tolerance.
The rejection of the violence that comes from third parties is another form of violence, as long as the engine of unintended human actions are the same lofty values based upon the absolute human rights and shipped out his will. And if so stipulated by the exclusion of the other at the base, they put that requirement a form of disregard and contempt ... and is violence.
The tolerance conditional caution and reserve it indicates the absence of disorder or confidence between the parties. This is what drives the necessity to establish a liberal tolerance of any bargaining.
In terms of content:
Making conditional tolerance and any height requirement of tolerance also prevents attached rights and turns him about tolerance and does not encourage the continuation of peaceful coexistence between the parties. But this coexistence depends on the condition. There is no peaceful coexistence Dalla back on tolerance and acceptance of the other. No violence and no apparent intentions of the finest.
Also, linking most interested in tolerance and coexistence between religions, creeds away from other areas like politics, economy and meeting. Vanity prophetic example of tolerance among human beings who should be at the level of the family and tribe and nation and humanity.
The "John Locke" opines that the separation of power between the celestial and religious political power ground so that respects the human state laws that protect the rights without the state as a society that opposes the political and ecclesial community. And accept this separation and differentiation will bring tolerance and end violence.
However, the controversy would not go away, but the interaction and rapprochement between peoples and the demise of the spatial and cultural barriers, and then overcomes the feeling of the human interactions and interdependence within the confines of the recognition of and respect for privacy and awareness.
Conclusion:
If the issue of the justification of violence Mvsoda and make it conscious, and that wisdom in the rapprochement between the two extremes and combine the diaspora and that the task of bridging the dispute is not within the reach of all people. It is often blurred insight intolerance, and human Aaklh turns to his will and the means in the hands of instinct. While the wisdom requires the realization of the mind liberated from the dominion of instinct, and accept to live with others, not by virtue of circumstances, but rather by virtue of human brotherhood, which are superior for clinging including where to disagree awareness of what we have in common.
Written by Unknown
We are Creative Blogger Theme Wavers which provides user friendly, effective and easy to use themes. Each support has free and providing HD support screen casting.
.jpg)
.jpg)
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire